Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna Brogan vs Rutuja Bhosale Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brogan vs Bhosale analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna Brogan vs Rutuja Bhosale Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Brogan 1 - 0 Bhosale
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brogan has won 45.59% of points on his second serve, while Bhosale has won 41.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brogan, in recent form, has won 41.27% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bhosale has won 53.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.13% and 41.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brogan has saved 59.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bhosale has saved 50.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brogan has won 46.43% of matches played (W/L 13/ 15), with Bhosale winning 58.33% (W/L 28/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brogan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 27/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 13/ 17). Bhosale has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 177/ 134), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Brogan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14), where as Bhosale has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brogan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brogan winning 2 and Bhosale winning 0. The last match between Brogan and Bhosale was at the W15 Sharm El Sheikh, 18-11-2020, First, Hard with Anna Brogan getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brogan and Bhosale have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brogan winning 0 times and Bhosale 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Brogan winning 2, and Bhosale 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brogan has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.29 while Bhosale has played against players with an average rank of 332.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brogan has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bhosale has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brogan has converted 47.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bhosale has converted 40.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
472
Rank
303
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
366
Rank
313
High
28
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
61% (167-106)
Career Total W/L
56% (204-162)
0% (0-3)
YTD W/L
56% (14-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anna Brogan | Rutuja Bhosale |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 79% (66/84) | 62% (56/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (43/66) | 66% (37/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (8/18) | 49% (17/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (37/91) | 39% (33/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Anna Brogan
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
79%
(
66 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna Brogan | Rutuja Bhosale |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/3) | 56% (14/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 54% (30/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (25/38) | 51% (258/245) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 57% (12/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 291.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (155/223) | 65% (932/1426) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (83/155) | 60% (558/932) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (31/68) | 40% (199/494) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (9/19) | 37% (87/234) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (79/202) | 46% (728/1593) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 48% (10/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 57% (13/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 17% (12/2) |
Anna Brogan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Anna Brogan
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Anna Brogan
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Anna Brogan
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Anna Brogan
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Anna Brogan
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Brogan
Player
Valentina Ryser
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
0
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Brogan
Player
Anouk Koevermans
74%
(
88 of
119)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
117)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
117)
121
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Anna Brogan
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Anna Brogan
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Brogan
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rutuja Bhosale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
74%
(
92 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
58 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
53 of
95)
119
Total Points Won
100
|
6-1 6-7(5) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Aoi Ito
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Petra Hule
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
76%
(
93 of
123)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
56 of
93)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
49 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zarina Diyas
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Haru Ohno
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Unknown Player
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
4 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Xinyu Gao
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brogan Vs Bhosale Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
